- Use-case analysis is a judgment call about genuine fit, not an assumption that Claude helps everywhere — it sits upstream of both entry-point selection (Module 1) and evaluation design (Module 3)
- Delegation is applied per step (AI-appropriate / human-retained / collaborative), not per workflow — one wrongly-automated step can undermine an otherwise well-delegated process, and deliberate boundary-setting is what turns individual wins into workflow value
- Integrating into an existing workflow means choosing between augmenting (lower risk, narrower change) and redesigning (higher potential value, higher stakes) — and retaining review/approval/escalation checkpoints unless there's a deliberate reason to remove them
- Stakeholder communication about Claude's value and limitations should be accurate, avoiding both overselling (erodes trust on first failure) and underselling (blocks legitimate adoption) — and should be grounded in the same specific risk knowledge from Module 3, not generic hedging
Key Takeaways
Estimated time: 3 minutes