The objective here is accurate communication of value, practical limitations, risks, and required human involvement — accuracy, not optimism or caution as a reflexive default.
Overselling risk: promising more autonomy or accuracy than the workflow actually delivers erodes trust the first time it visibly fails — and it will, eventually.
Underselling risk: excessive hedging can block adoption of a workflow change that would have delivered real value, out of an overcorrection against overselling.
Accurate communication draws on Module 3's evaluation judgment directly — knowing concretely where hallucination and verification risk concentrate is what turns a "here are the limitations" conversation with a stakeholder into something substantive, rather than a generic disclaimer that doesn't actually inform their decision.